
Saturday, 30th January 2010 - 15:14CET
Toni Abela insists he is against abortion, PN accuses him of political convenience
Labour Party Deputy Leader Toni Abela insisted this afternoon that he was against abortion, but the Nationalist party said that his statement, a few days after his comments on the TV programme Dissett, were 'laughable and unbelievable'.
In a statement, Dr Abela said that a malicious campaign had been mounted against him after comments he gave on the TV programme Dissett. On the programme, he said, he had been asked about a 2003 interview by a newspaper where he was questioned about abortion in the context of the war in the Balkans.
He had made it clear on Dissett that that was the opinion he had at the time.
"I publicly declare that that I have since then changed my view and my position is against any abortion, " Dr Abela said.
He said that Joseph Muscat had made the PL's position against abortion very clear, and he agreed with that position.
Dr Abela said he was always pro-life and he was actually the only lawyer in Malta who had sought and been granted a warrant to stop a woman from going abroad for an abortion. He had given this service without charge and, Dr Abela said, he did not institute proceedings that he did not believe in.
PN REACTION
The Nationalist Party said that Dr Abela's position on abortion was shameful.
It said that Dr Abela had confirmed that he had been of the view that abortion should be allowed in certain cases, but now he was saying he had changed his view.
This, the PN said, was nothing but shameful political convenience. When he spoke freely to a newspaper, he had been in favour of abortion in certain circumstances, such as in cases where the baby had disabilities.
Dr Abela had said:
"I agree with abortion, if the life of the mother is in danger, in the case of rape and if it is certain that the unborn foetus will be a severely handicapped child."
On Dissett a few days ago, Dr Abela had reiterated his position in favour of abortion in certain circumstances, yet the PL deputy leader was now attacking those who reported that he had said. It would have been more serious and ethically correct had he apologised instead of attacking the media, the PN said.
That he was now saying that he had changed his position was laughable and unbelievable, the PN added.








RSS
Comments
There come situations in life that bringing a child in this world, will be more traumatic for the mother and the child! Giving it up for adoption is an option but it always leaves the child with a missing sense of its biological roots; from where they really originated and how, and to whom they really belong - plus the famous WHY after which they need to find acceptance to move on! It is naturally hard and psychotherapists have to deal with the spheres where the adoptive parents will always fail to reach! For the mother it is a greater sense of loss to give up the baby person after birth especially if bonding sets in during the pregnancy or childbirth!
So please just let the 'mothers' decide for themselves! Their instincts can guide them well enough!
Well I am a nationalist really. What do I do. Change to voting labour. What has women's rights got to do with what Dr Gonzi's party and/or Dr. Muscat's party, thinks. Women should be free to decide individually and for themselves.
Only three out of all EU countries outlaw abortion Poland, Ireland, Malta. As I understand it, Portugal legalized abortion too bringing the overwhelmingly Roman Catholic country in line with most others. So What! These are still not not good reason! Women should be free to decide for themselves.
Otherwise as is in fact happening, it becomes a matter of who can afford the trip to go to another EU Country. Effectively, those that can afford it, proceed be they PN or LP. The poor obviously cannot and the options?: be they PN or LP, they would need to seek an illegal back street operation?
Even I do not agree with abortion is a bad statement. I personally do not BELIEVE that abortion is right. Imma, surely I cannot also feel omnipotenti and impose what I believe on others too!
In an open a free democracy, everyone should be free to follow his conscience and express his opinions without fear of repercussions.
This clearly shows the hypocrisy of the PN who on the one hand wants to be part of the EU elite and seen as a progressive player in Belgium but upon landing in Malta resorts back to espousing the 'status quo' and opinions that have held sway here for hundreds of years, with certain subjects like abortion being completely taboo and cannot even be the topic of a healthy democratic debate.
I, am against abortion, but then who am I to condemn others who think differently about abortion?
Are Gift of life in a position to stop Maltese women having an abortion abroad?
Gift of life may be a good cause, but they have to stop harassing people in this open minded democratic country of ours.
@ Ernest Vella
I have it from one of our leading physicians that cases where it has to be determined which life gets the priority to be saved are extremely rare. However, when these rare cases arise, legally and morally the attending physician is obliged to focus their attention on saving the life of the baby even if the mother’s life is at risk. In another rare scenario, when the two lives are in imminent danger but the abortion of the baby would save the life of the mother, our law would still not allow an abortion. I was also given reasons to believe that in spite of the law and the teachings of the church a doctor would more than likely abort the baby.
Stupru mhux accettat, huwa biss att annimalisk ma hu imhabba xejn.
Inhallu f'idejn il-mara li giet stuprata u hadd izjed.
Il-bqija kollha ipokresija.
Tindahhlux lill-min hu mgarrab.
@Ernest Vella
It's easy to comment and judge when you haven't experienced the terrible trauma of rape.
@_Michael_Seychell
My_point_is_a_simple_one_to_understand, it is very easy for any person to condemn what appears to be an evil deed committed by another person. Difficulties arise when that person is forced to make a choice in similar circumstances.
My scenario is indeed farfetched yet thousands of mothers worldwide are faced with situations equally difficult and finally put their deeply rooted stance against abortion and try to save their lives.
The immensely sad episode of the Gozo Siamese twins is still vivid in our memories. We all remember the torments of the parents before they made their final decision, we also remember some of the people’s condemnations. That story had a happy ending because the medical profession, through God’s help, saved the life of a child who would otherwise have died.
I hope that you will not come round to tell me that the Gozo episode has got nothing to do with abortion because it has.
As to your direct question, if I were a pregnant woman, which is extremely hypothetical, I think I would base my final decision depending on the severity of the handicap. In all probabilities I will not opt for abortion.
If being modern and progressive will mean accepting abortion than its better for us to remain in the dark ages for a society who kills her children is not a society I want to live in.
PS.Jiena ma nafdahomx il-politici, huma min huma...ghax l-ewwel jghidu mod umbat idawruha u jergghu idawwruha ghal inkonvenjenza poltika taghhom...u mhux ghal Dr.Abela qieghed nghid imma ghall-maggoranza tal-politici...qabel mod wara iehor
Who ever says that women are baby making machines has an obtuse mind. However the excuse that a women fears for hear health after becoming pregnant does not hold ground at all. If a women does not want to become pregnant for any reason she must use any form of contraception that she pleases whilst having sex or slept alone. It is irresponsible for a women to first have sex and then contemplates abortion if she gets pregnant.
L-Abort huwa meta direttament u konxjament isir intervent mediku biex tinqatel it-tarbija, b'velenu, b'vacuum, b'ghodda etc u johorguha bicca bicca.
This is a warning to those who believe that the Partit Laburista will introduce progressive and liberal legislation such as divorce or gay rights. They will probably make a very big U-turn as soon as the arch bishop issues a declaration.
I am against abortion (as a general rule) but in the case you put forward i would reconsider.....particularly in view of the fact that the mother's life is in danger....but that case is an extreme one....I am against abortion if it transpires that a newborn is a disabled to be
@cfarrugia.. it irks when all of a sudden the baby is sole property of the woman. out of the window goes all the hulabaloo of encouraging fathers to take part, because she wants to study !? thats very superficial indeed. would u also tolerate men who are in difficult life situation Cfarrugia or would you run to the courts to get maintainance ? having said that i agree if woman's life is in danger to give her a choice
The PL is working hard on their PR but the level of competence shows them up all the time - they can try to fool us but they will not succeed. If they do we will pay the price - like we always have when they have been in power!
Being pro-life is also after the child is born and we have to look after and make sure that future generations have a healthy environment to live in, with the least possible pollution, black-dust, and greenery.
Being pro-life is also looking into why a child in his early teens gets arrested for stealing a chocolate bar to sustain himself in Malta 2010.
As for Political convenience - is this the PN, Gonzipn talking? If that’s not laughable, I’d call it PATHETHIC. : )
I have read your far fetched scenario, since in our country the number of persons having HIV is very limited, and therefore it is very improbabile that our daughters would be in the company of such unfortunate persons.
I wonder whether you would oblige to share your toughts with us commentators, and tell us what will be your reaction, if GOD FORBID, a women or 'girl' were to consider aborting a handicapped baby'
Michael Seychell
Tal Pieta
I agree 100% with you.......as one has to see and think about this when he or one of his family is involved. And for me it's has to be there choice and noone elses.
Who is to tell that girl that has been raped that she has to live and bear the child of some who brutally attacked her.
Of course one has to be against abortion, but all these writing against what Dr.Abela said for me are all hypocrits.
They should put their hand on their heart and truly say what would they do if there daughter is brutally raped!!!!
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cHTosynGkRM
I'm not sure if I understood your point, but if I'm not mistaken, in the case that the mother has to die in oder for the baby to live, then the mother would have the right to choose that she lives at the expense that her baby dies. In recorded history there exists a saint who was in fact declared saint for her choice to die so that her baby lives. If it were vice-versa she would not have committed any abortion.
BUT killing an unborn child!!!
I would never live with that on my conscience,
and believe me, most mothers who have done an abortion, pass through a depressive episode, and will normally regret that decision all their life.
It is criminal that we work so hard to make difficult surgeries a safe procedure, but then fail to use our skills to provide women with a safe way to end an unhealthy or unwanted pregnancy. Criminal.
'If men could get pregnant, abortion would be a sacrament.' Erica Jong
If we're to measure by the same yardstick, then, the PN is still bound by its promise to remove tax altogether. It's been promised over 30 years ago. Am still waiting. Was promised by Bonello Dupuis. Does the PN still feel bound to that promise although Dupuis is no longer part of the party? There are many examples, but no, the purists here all they want to talk is about a personal opinion! Halluna!
i think only the woman has the right to decide, not some male politicians who have no idea what stress a pregnancy entails
two friends of mine are pregnant at the moment and being pregnant is not exactly a pleasant experience with a lot of symptoms even if all goes well, let alone if something is wrong. If one is going to have child who one did not want in the first place, one does not exactly feel happy during the pregnancy either. i do not think any man can understand this, the consequences are on the health and socioeconomic status of the future mother and not on any male. in malta the "fathers" do not even have to pay anything for the child if they do not want to, and the female has all the stress while the man just had his pleasure. do you find this right?
Can the pro-abortionists tell me what rights does a prospective father have if the woman carrying his child would decide to abort because she wants to go ahead with her job / profession?
And please stop linking abortion to rape in Malta. How many ladies get pregnant in Malta because of rape? Are not the absolute majority of unwanted pregnancies in Malta the result of some "lapsus"?
The case you mentioned is less than one in 10,00.000 chance (counting all the details you gave).
And it is cases like these which are the first step into full legalisation of abortion.
So no, I stand up to be counted to tell you straight and plain; look at Ireland, Portugal, Spain, indeed most of Europe. They all legalised abortion after first legalising the one-in-a-million chance you mentioned.
Mis-seba' tittiehed l-id.
If I had a daughter who came home bleeding to death after getting raped by an HIV positive monster with one eye and no fingers on his hands and the doctors tell us that the girl’s life is in imminent danger unless she aborts, then I will reconsider my position. Any contributor who feels differently please stand up to be counted.
I, for one, would support wholeheartedly the woman's right BUT I also support the right of the unborn child to see the light of day. Do you???
According to your arguments St Paul who saw his conversion on his way to Damascus should have never been trusted and should have never been made a Saint because he used to persecute the early Christians.
And what about the right for a woman that is raped??
In that case she should decide what to do and nobody else. Do you call the child born from a rape as 'fruit of love'?
It would only be a reminder of the horrible experience.
When it comes to rape I am in favour for 'the right of choice'.
On Dissett Toni, a well versed lawyer and having an eloquent mouth, stated also that he considers that a women may abort in case she becomes aware that the unborn baby could have a disability .
It was very convenient for Tony to state that he 'forgot' to mention this statement and he mentioned only that the interview he gave 3 years ago was 'in the context of the war in the Balkans'
Michael Seychell
Tal-Pieta
Does Toni Abela know what he is saying? I wonder. He first declares that he has now changed his view and his position is against any abortion whilst further on he says that he was always pro-life.
Since he himself declares publicly that he has since the 2003 interview changed his view, he could not therefore have always been pro-life. One declaration contradicts the other.
http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/2003/01/05/people.html
On abortion, what were his ideas?
"I agree with abortion, if the life of the mother is in danger, in the case of rape and if it is certain that the unborn foetus will be a severely handicapped child." - Toni Abela
If GOL is so pro-life and has no hidden agenda, as the timing indicates otherwise, why not use its resources and campaign on responsible sex education in school starting from pre-teens, including in church schools?
Education support and counseling is the solution in a country that in successive years of Nationalist administrations has lost its moral fiber.
I would personally think about abortion if i get raped and this has nothing to do about LP or PN but about me. i would be carrying the baby of a rapist and this is no joke and please stop trying to be saints in everything and stop pointing your fingers at others all the time.
First of all I will never shut up because even dogs have a right to voice their opinion.
Secondly, mixing wars with abortion is like mixing ........ in Maltese we have an expression that is suited perfectly for your thoughts. But since you want an opinion here is mine.
If wars are fought to defend the sovereignty of your country than they are justified. If they are fought for oil or other reasons they are not.
he mentioned exceptions...that wasn't build it up...because we all understand Maltese...maybe his words were not his thoughts.
@ Mario Bonnici - you are speaking of the right of expression - but you forget that the unborn child has THE RIGHT TO LIVE - your argument falls completly
he mentioned exceptions...that wasn't build it up...because we all understand Maltese...maybe his words were not his thoughts.
Toni Abela in an interview in Maltatoday - http://www.maltatoday.com.mt/2003/01/05/people.html
Nahseb li Toni Abela mhux qed ikun onest mal-poplu Malti...dak li tfisser li tkun progressiv Ton ?
Pressure must have been heaped on him!
Remember Toni Abela was the fearless labourite who wanted to clean the party of the corrupt and violent elements it harboured. For that he was thrown out of the party. Nobody intimidates our Toni. No, he has seen the light and has been told that the position he tholds on abortion is losing the LP support, so he changed his stance. Pure and Simple. But give him a opportunity and he will be back to his original stance. Remember Labour- AD- Labour. That is Toni's political record.
http://www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/comexpert/Summary.htm#AIX
Are you in favour or against killings in wars?
Answer question to prove your consistency please. Otherwise shut up.
Listen, evaluate and yes if necessary change your opinion. That is called evolution,maturity.
I am not a staunch catholic person but I believe that abortion is a crime against innocent life, be it disabled or not.
What if he changes his mind again post 2013?
Hbieb Toni Abela ta` wara l-leader... Tahwid enormi fil-PL
The recent Haiti earthquake and the Herculean efforts to find and rescue potential survivors, should shake all of us to confront not only the terrible end of so many lives but the question
of the brginnings of so many others.
So does a 'personal opinion' change overnight simply because the Party Leader makes a statement?
How cheap! How petty!!
Dr Abela made his personal opinion very clear on dissett. He has to be held to account for it. He is the deputy leader of the party, and, assuming, that as Dr Muscat says, the opinion of everyone is heard within party structures, I am sure Dr Abela's 'personal opinion' will have an impact on party policy.
If not, then, this leaves no doubt - Dr Muscat dictates policy on his officials and they have to abide...even if they dont beleive in it.
Dear PL, you can stay playing with words on economy, education, foreign affairs etc.. but please be clear on what you really beleive in when it comes to the life of the innocent...
BIEX SER TOHORGU ISSA BIEX TIPPRUVAW MINN GHALIKOM TAGHTU PALATA LIL TAN- NET U L-PN eh???????
ISSA OQGHODU KWIETI
Am I not pleased to be amongst those! You bet!
It is inconceivable that one can change his mind on such fundamental issues, that is, unless you are a celebrated political opportunist or maybe progressive! No wonder you’re Joe’s favourite …..birds of a feather flock together!
Minn fejn qed jonfoh ir-rih Guz!
A women is pregnant. The pregnancy has led to serious and grave complications, so much so that her own life is in jeopardy. There is a very big chance that she will die if the pregnancy is not terminated by urgent medical procedures. In Malta she cannot have an abortion because abortion is a criminal offence under any circumstance, life-threatening pregnancy or otherwise. Therefore she has no choice but to practically sacrifice her own life for another. It could also be the case that both woman and child die.
Who decides that the life of the unborn child is more precious than an otherwise healthy 24-year old woman? What "measuring instrument" (other than biblical references and/or Catholic dogma) does one use to calculate which of the two lives is more precious? Ultimately, shouldn't this woman be given a choice as to whether she should take the very brave and admirable decision to sacrifice her life or not?
"One cannot change his opinion like that on a delicate subject such as abortion. Please do not treat people like fools. Those days are over."